//
archives

judicial magistrate

This tag is associated with 2 posts

whether the notice dated 2.01.2004 was issued within the stipulated period of thirty days from the date of receipt of intimation of the dishonour of cheque.whether the notice was sent within 30 days from the date of returncheque was presented by the complainant for collection to his banker namely UCO Bank, Trichy Main Branch on 27.11.2003. It was dishonoured with the remarks “insufficient funds” on 2.12.2003. Information thereabout was received by the respondent on 3.12.2003. 4. On 02.01.2004, the respondent issued a legal notice to the appellant calling upon him to pay the amount in question within 15 days from the date of the receipt of the notice. Admittedly, the appellant neither sent a reply to the said notice nor paid the amount due.

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1077 OF 2009 [Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 7797 of 2007] Sivakumar …Appellant Versus Natarajan …Respondent JUDGMENT S.B. SINHA, J : 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed against a judgment and order dated 03.02.2007 passed by the Madurai Bench … Continue reading

whether the cheque bouns case can be compounded ?-The object of Section 320 Cr.P.C., which would not in the strict sense of the term apply to a proceeding under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, gives the parties to the proceedings an opportunity to compound offences mentioned in the table contained in the said section, with or without the leave of the court, and also vests the court with jurisdiction to allow such compromise. By virtue of Sub-Section (8), the Legislature has taken one step further in vesting jurisdiction in the Court to also acquit the accused/convict of the offence on the same being allowed to be compounded. Inasmuch as, it is with a similar object in mind that Section 147 has been inserted into the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, by amendment, an analogy may be drawn as to the intention of the Legislature as expressed in Section 320(8) Cr.P.C., although, the same has not been expressly mentioned in the amended section to a proceeding under Section 147 of the aforesaid Act.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.2281 OF 2009 (Arising out of S.L.P.(Crl.)No…9263/09 CRL.M.P.15423/2009) K.M. IBRAHIM … APPELLANT Vs. K.P. MOHAMMED & ANR. … RESPONDENTS J U D G M E N T ALTAMAS KABIR, J. 1. Delay condoned. 2. Leave granted. 3. The appellant issued a cheque to the … Continue reading

Blog Stats

  • 149,325 hits

ADVOCATE MMMOHAN

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,214 other subscribers